<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Waylon Kenning Blog &#187; web application</title>
	<atom:link href="http://kenning.co.nz/tag/web-application/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://kenning.co.nz</link>
	<description>Travel, Identity Management, IT Observations, Life</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Jan 2012 23:49:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Why no one likes your web application&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://kenning.co.nz/e-commerce/why-no-one-likes-your-web-application/</link>
		<comments>http://kenning.co.nz/e-commerce/why-no-one-likes-your-web-application/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jul 2008 23:39:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Waylon</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[E-Commerce]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Usability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[web application]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[your website sucks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kenning.co.nz/?p=61</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The usability sucks. I hate to say it, but it&#8217;s true, and it&#8217;s causing your site to lose money. As designers/programmers/business analysts, we often focus on features rather than the end user like Apple&#8217;s iPhone. What made consumers drool over the iPhone? It wasn&#8217;t features, like the Nokia N95. The iPhone can&#8217;t even do Picture [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The <a href="http://www.useit.com/alertbox/9605a.html">usability sucks</a>. I hate to say it, but it&#8217;s true, and it&#8217;s <a href="http://www.useit.com/alertbox/20010819.html">causing your site to lose money</a>. As designers/programmers/business analysts, we often <a href="http://experiencedynamics.blogs.com/site_search_usability/2007/02/feature_frenzy_.html">focus on features</a> rather than the end user like <a href="http://www.apple.com/iphone/">Apple&#8217;s iPhone</a>.</p>
<p>What made consumers drool over the iPhone? It wasn&#8217;t features, like the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nokia_N95">Nokia N95</a>. The iPhone can&#8217;t even <a href="http://www.boingboing.net/2007/09/21/iphone-to-include-im.html">do Picture Messaging</a>. It was of course, the <a href="http://www.asktog.com/columns/070iPhoneFirstLook.html">User Interface</a>. People camped outside waiting in line to order an iPhone because of how the application interacted with the user. Do they do this with your web application?</p>
<p>Probably not. <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Web_2.0">Web 2.0</a> is making many nice looking websites, but so what? Popular websites are generally:</p>
<ol>
<li><a href="http://www.wired.com/techbiz/it/magazine/16-03/ff_free?currentPage=all">Free</a>. It&#8217;s the future of business.</li>
<li>Simple. <a href="http://twitter.com/">Twitter</a> is txt-messaging for the web.</li>
<li>Focused on the user. Why else is <a href="http://www.basecamphq.com/">Basecamp</a> so <a href="http://www.basecamphq.com/buzz">successful</a>?</li>
</ol>
<p>So here&#8217;s my call to action: I&#8217;m going to work on making <a href="http://sovietbadges.co.nz">Sovietbadges.co.nz</a> easier to use. It should be like using <a href="http://configure.us.dell.com/dellstore/config.aspx?c=us&amp;cs=19&amp;l=en&amp;oc=DNDWPA4&amp;s=dhs">Dell.com</a>. What are you going to do?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://kenning.co.nz/e-commerce/why-no-one-likes-your-web-application/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

